|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Used when a local government agency violates the Brown Act) Courtesy of California First Amendment Coalition |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Send by Registered Mail, Return Receipt Requested) (Date) Presiding Officer
(Name of Local Agency) Dear _________, This letter is to call your attention to what I believe was a substantial violation of a central provision of the Ralph M. Brown Act, one which may jeopardize the finality of the action taken by (name of legislative body and local agency). The nature of the violation is as follows: In its meeting of (date), the (name of legislative body) took action to (describe the action taken, specifying the proposal and in what fashion it was acted upon, i.e. by either a formal vote, an "approval in concept," or some other reflection of a consensus that the body would act or not act in a certain manner in the future). The action taken was not in compliance with the Brown Act because (specify one or both) it occurred as the culmination of a discussion in closed session of a matter which the Act does not permit to be discussed in closed session (and/or) there was no adequate notice to the public on the posted agenda for the meeting that the matter acted upon would be discussed, and there was no finding of fact made by the (name of legislative body) that urgent action was necessary on a matter unforeseen at the time the agenda was posted. In the event it appears to you that the conduct of the (name of legislative body) specified herein did not amount to the taking of action, I call your attention to Section 54952.6, which defines "action taken" for the purposes of the Act expansively, i.e. as "a collective decision made by a majority of the members of a legislative body, a collective commitment or promise by a majority of the members of a legislative body to make a positive or negative decision, or an actual vote by a majority of the members of a legislative body when sitting as a body or entity, upon a motion, proposal, resolution, order or ordinance." As you are aware, 1986 amendments to the Brown Act created specific
agenda
Pursuant to that provision (Government Code Section 54960.1), I demand
that the (name of legislative body) cure and correct the illegally taken
action as follows: (specify whatever corrective action you believe necessary
to redress the illegality and provide the public the awareness and
opportunity to comment of which it was deprived, e.g. the formal and explicit
withdrawal from any commitment made, coupled with a disclosure at a subsequent
meeting of why individual members of the legislative body took the positions
--- by vote or otherwise --- that they did, accompanied by the full opportunity
for informed comment by members of the public at the same meeting, notice
of which is properly included on the posted agenda. Informed comment might
in certain circumstances include the provision of any and all documents
in the possession of the local agency related to the action taken, with
copies available to the public on request at the offices of the
agency and also at the meeting at which
As provided by Section 54960.1 you have 30 days from the receipt of this demand to either cure or correct the challenged action or inform me of your decision not to do so. If you fail to cure or correct as demanded, such inaction may leave me no recourse but to seek a judicial invalidation of the challenged action pursuant to Section 54960.1, in which case I would seek the award of court costs and reasonable attorney fees pursuant to Section 54960.5. Respectfully yours, S/
Copies sent to: (Name and title of agency's legal advisor)
(Local Daily Media)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
831 / 624-6500 P.O. Box 1495, Carmel, CA 93921 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|