Helping Our Peninsula's Environment |
||
|
Threat to Carmel River from "science" report falsely claiming the river only needs a trickle of water. (c) Copyright 2003 David Dilworth |
|
Possibly the most dangerous document ever written about the Carmel River just surfaced in January 2003. Your help is needed. When the Water Management District Board asked for it, the report was supposed to show what flows are needed to restore and maintain the Carmel River habitat for the imperiled species which depend upon it including the West Coast steelhead and the California red-legged frog. The report, given to the board Jan 30, 2003 (but thankfully not officially received), claims that only a trickle of water is necessary for the fish to survive.(1) The lower the flows -- the worse for fish and frogs, and the better for developers. The report claims it is only restating what other scientific studies report. But under questioning from one Director, the report's author from Jones & Stokes admitted that the minimum water flows recommended by the federal agency experts responsible for restoring the Steelhead habitat (NOAA) were "significantly higher." This report is dangerous because its flow recommendations could still be used to determine how much MORE water developers can pump from the Carmel River for more development, more golf courses and even worse - justify a new dam. The report was intended for "Environmental Impact Significance Thresholds" determinations for the Dam Environmental Impact Report (EIR). If the thresholds of significance are set at very low water flows - it means a new dam and increased pumping are easier to justify. |
||
What's wrong?
Perhaps the biggest outrage is that the consultants were PAID for this poor report and the UNPAID public now has the burden to complain, and provide the evidence and reasoning to clean up the damage and essentially do the consultant's work for them! Please call your Water District Boardmember today and urge them to --
________________ (1) "Minimum daily flow of 1-5 [cubic feet per second] at Narrows..." Table ES-1, page 2 of 2 Dangerous Flow Report by Jones & Stokes (PDF - 9 megabytes) (2) An Appellate Court found that the loss of as little as a quarter of an acre of imperiled species habitat is a clearly significant environmental impact. (Mira Monte Homeowners Assoc 165 Cal. App 3rd 357) |
||
Search HOPE's Website: |
||
Feedback - Info(at)1hope.org 831 / 624-6500 P.O. Box 1495, Carmel, CA 93921 |
||
This Page Last Updated February 4, 2003 |