{"id":1061,"date":"2011-03-23T18:25:25","date_gmt":"2011-03-24T01:25:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/1hope.org\/hopeblog\/?p=1061"},"modified":"2024-12-27T16:45:35","modified_gmt":"2024-12-28T00:45:35","slug":"pges-smartmeters-apparently-send-your-data-un-encrypted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1hope.org\/hopeblog\/pges-smartmeters-apparently-send-your-data-un-encrypted\/","title":{"rendered":"Privacy Violation: PG&E’s “Smart”meters Apparently Send Your Data UN-Encrypted !"},"content":{"rendered":"

The job of a Burglar and a Stalker is now easier than ever – thanks to Smartmeters.<\/p>\n

(Update: Dec 2024: Its been over a decade since I first wrote this warning. I’ve decided to investigate the “smart”meters wifi data and see if PG$E is still sending your data UnEncrypted. If they are, I will file a formal complaint with the FBI.)<\/p>\n

I just found a revealing section of PG&E’s Public Relations<\/a> materials (always of dubious factual accuracy) that indicates that your personal data sent from your so-called “Smart”meter is NOT<\/u> encrypted or coded.<\/a> <\/p>\n

It appears that your personal energy use data is not encrypted until after<\/u> it is collected by a neighborhood device called an “access point device.” <\/p>\n

In the meantime your uncoded plaintext (completely readable) data may have been relayed and sent by half a dozen (my estimate) or more neighboring “smart”meters before it gets to the “access point device.”<\/p>\n

PG&E’s document says — <\/p>\n

\u201cThe electric network access point collects meter data from nearby electric meters and periodically transfers this data to PG&E via a secure cellular network. Each<\/U> RF mesh-enabled device (meters<\/U>, relays) is connected to several other mesh-enabled devices, which function as signal repeaters, relaying the data to an access point<\/U>. The access point device<\/U> aggregates, encrypts<\/U>, and sends the data back to PG&E over a secure commercial third-party network.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In English this means \u2013 <\/p>\n

Combining and Collecting Step: Each smartmeter captures and transmits your neighbors signals (or vice versa), then your combined personal data is relayed using radio signals to an access point device; and collector of neighborhood data. <\/p>\n

Encryption and Transmit Step: Only then does your data get encrypted (coded) by the \u201caccess point device.\u201d Then the combined and encrypted data is sent to PG&E over a (now irrelevantly secure) cell-phone line.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Here’s the PG&E Webpage — http:\/\/www.pge.com\/myhome\/customerservice\/smartmeter\/howitworks\/<\/a><\/p>\n

That means your neighborhood burglar doesn’t even need special software to crack your data – because it is not coded until it has been sent by radio signals through the air of your neighborhood.<\/p>\n

This contradicts everything PG&E’s Public Relations<\/a> spinners have told government officials in public meetings. When asked about hacking the data they have insisted that they use the highest quality encryption software, and “no one has ever broken into a cell-phone network.”<\/p>\n

They “forgot” to tell us that our personal power use data can be captured by anyone – long before it ever gets to the encryption step.<\/p>\n

Now burglars can tell when you are away from home with a simple standard laptop and an inexpensive WiFi card.<\/p>\n

Of course you already knew we can’t trust PG&E (who killed 8 people with their San Bruno fireball)<\/a>, and we can’t trust the PUC — it was their systematic incompetence and negligence that allowed PG&E to foment the deadly fireball that destroyed 37 homes.<\/a><\/p>\n

___________________<\/center><\/p>\n

1. Notice how it clearly says “The access point device … encrypts, and sends the data back to PG&E”<\/p>\n

However it never says or implies that each individual SmartMeter\u2122 encrypts your data.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The job of a Burglar and a Stalker is now easier than ever – thanks to Smartmeters. (Update: Dec 2024: Its been over a decade since I first wrote this warning. I’ve decided to investigate the “smart”meters wifi data and … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[25,19,32],"tags":[55],"class_list":["post-1061","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-smartmeters","category-bad-acts","category-incompetence","tag-san-bruno"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1hope.org\/hopeblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1061"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1hope.org\/hopeblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1hope.org\/hopeblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1hope.org\/hopeblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1hope.org\/hopeblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1061"}],"version-history":[{"count":26,"href":"https:\/\/1hope.org\/hopeblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1061\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3360,"href":"https:\/\/1hope.org\/hopeblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1061\/revisions\/3360"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1hope.org\/hopeblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1061"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1hope.org\/hopeblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1061"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1hope.org\/hopeblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}